Eyespot in wheat


Oculimacula yallundae (anamorph Helgardia herpotrichoides), W-type

Oculimacula acuformis (anamorph Helgardia acuformis), R-type


The disease affects wheat, barley, oats, rye and triticale.

O. yallundae is more pathogenic on wheat and barley than on rye.

O. acuformis is pathogenic on wheat, barley, rye and triticale.

Mixed R and W-type eyespot infections occur in most UK crops.


Although severe and early attacks of eyespot can kill seedlings outright, eyespot symptoms typically first become visible in early spring. Symptoms appear as a brown smudge at the stem base. They have a diffuse margin and appear on one side of the outer leaf sheath. Symptoms can be confused with sharp eyespot and fusarium foot rot. However, as eyespot is much more important than these diseases, correct identification is important.

As the season progresses, symptoms become more distinct with an eye-shaped lesion with a dark, diffuse, margin, usually below the first node. A central black 'pupil' may be visible: this is a mass of compacted hyphae and is difficult to remove by rubbing. Eyespot lesions then penetrate through the leaf layers. This is different to fusarium foot rot and sharp eyespot lesions, which tend to be confined to the outer leaf sheath during stem extension. As leaf sheaths die off during spring growth, eyespot symptoms may disappear but can reappear later. Look at stem bases from the milky ripe stage to see if eyespot lesions are present.

Severe eyespot infections can weaken stems around the lesion and cause lodging – stems can fall in all directions, as opposed to lodging caused by wind. Alternatively, whiteheads (bleached ears) may form, where nutrient and water flow is restricted to the rest of the plant. Eventually, whiteheads may be colonised by sooty moulds and turn black. The hollow of infected straw is sometimes filled with a grey fungal growth in the region of the lesion.

Life cycle

Eyespot inoculum overwinters on infected stubble and volunteers. In the UK, the fungus has a sexual and an asexual phase. The sexual phase produces ascospores on stubble after harvest.  Dispersed by wind across long distances, these spores infect emerging or young plants throughout the autumn and winter. The asexual phase produces conidia on stubble and trash over the winter. These spores are rain-splashed short distances onto cereal stem bases. The presence of an airborne stage means that surrounding crops can infect first wheat crops in the absence of infected trash. Therefore, the influence of previous cropping is not as large as it was thought to be.

The disease can survive on stubble and trash for three years, especially if buried. Therefore, a one or two year break from cereals does not always reduce eyespot risk. Grass weeds also act as sources of inoculum.

Infection occurs at temperatures above 5C, with a daytime optimum temperature of 15C and a nighttime optimum temperature of 10C. High temperatures inhibit infection. Prolonged humid conditions are conducive to infection. Following infection, the development of symptoms normally takes about 12 weeks, depending on environmental conditions. Dry weather can cause infected outer leaf sheaths to shrivel and die, which may prevent infection from progressing.


Eyespot is a common disease in intensive cereal rotations. The disease most seriously affects autumn-sown crops, especially when inoculum builds up across the rotation. Spring cereals can also suffer from infection. The disease affects wheat more than barley. Although oats are much less susceptible, when infected, they can transfer inoculum between crops.

The disease tends to damage yield only when the lesion penetrates the leaf sheath. This restricts water and nutrient flow to the ear, reduces grain number and size and causes whiteheads. Associated lodging can also delay harvest, increase grain moisture, reduce grain quality and encourage other diseases. Moderate or severe eyespot infections can cause yield loss in the order of 10–30%, even in the absence of lodging.

High-risk factors

  • Cereal as a previous crop
  • Ploughing
  • Westerly region
  • Susceptible variety
  • High spring rainfall
  • Moisture retentive, heavy soil
  • Early sowing (especially before early October)
  • Volunteers and grassweeds
  • Mild, wet winter
  • Overfertilised crops


Rotation and previous crop

Although a one or two year break from cereals reduces eyespot inoculum in the field, it will not prevent infection via air-borne ascospores. Wheat as a previous crop poses a higher risk than another cereal as a previous crop. A non-cereal crop, such as oilseed rape, provides the least risk. Any cereal volunteers also provide a green bridge that harbours the disease


Use of minimum tillage to establish the crop reduces eyespot risk, compared to ploughing, as inoculum on ploughed-in trash can survive for three years. In a minimum tillage situation, even though there is more trash, the fungus is not able to survive as well.


The variety Cappelle Desprez is the source of most eyespot tolerance in winter wheat (no varieties are completely resistant). Winter wheat varieties believed to carry the Pch 1 resistance gene are indicated in the AHDB Recommended List (RL). The resistance of barley varieties to eyespot is not measured in the RL.

Sowing date

For wheat and barley, early sowing (before 6 October) favours severe attacks of eyespot. This exposes plants to infection for longer. Early sown crops also tend to produce dense growth with high tiller numbers. Delaying drilling (until at least 6 October) will reduce risk.


Grasses, such as annual meadow grass and couch, commonly carry types of the eyespot fungus that will infect wheat and barley. Therefore, controlling grass weeds will reduce risk.

Crop management

Overfertilised crops are more susceptible to eyespot infection and are more likely to lodge. Use the AHDB Nutrient management guide (RB209) to manage crop nutrition correctly. PGRs can help reduce the risk of lodging.

Risk assessment

Use this risk assessment to guide integrated pest management decisions. Although designed for winter wheat, it can provide a useful indicator of risk for barley, since the same fungi are involved. However, the calculations have not been tested for barley.

1. Calculate the pre-sowing risk score

The eyespot risk assessment in winter wheat includes a pre-sowing assessment. This helps identify higher-risk fields and can inform integrated pest management, for example by:

  • Selecting a different crop for the chosen field
  • Selecting a variety with higher eyespot resistance rating
  • Delaying sowing until at least 6 October
  • Using minimum tillage, rather than ploughing

In particular, consider such agronomic control measures if the pre-sowing risk score is greater than nine.

Factor Level Risk points Score
Region East 0
North 1
West 5
Soil type Light 0
Medium 1
Heavy 4
Previous crop Non-host 0
Other cereal 7
Wheat 8
Tillage Minimum till 0
Plough 6
Sowing date Late (on or after 6 October) 0
Early (before 6 October) 2
Pre-sowing risk score

2. Assess risk in spring

Assess the percentage incidence of plants with eyespot symptoms at GS31–32. Combine this information with the pre-sowing risk score to determine the final eyespot disease risk.

Eyespot disease assessment





Pre-sowing risk score


5–9 LM M M MH H
10–14 M M MH MH H
15–19 MH MH MH H H
20–25 H H H H H

3. Determine the need for chemical treatment

Good control is often difficult to achieve and affected by the type of eyespot present. Many treatments only reduce severity. Applications for eyespot control will provide control of other diseases. Yield response to foliar disease control usually exceeds response from eyespot treatment. Use results from the spring assessment to determine the need for chemical control.

  • Low (L) or low-medium (LM) risk: Specific eyespot treatment may not be justified
  • Medium (M) or medium-high (MH) risk: Where eyespot has been a recurring disease with consistent yield loss, treatment may be justified
  • High risk (H): Treatment may be justified, even in fields where eyespot rarely causes yield loss


Winter wheat


  • A spray targeted at foliar diseases at T0 will help control eyespot
  • If eyespot is the main target, a T0 spray may not be economic
  • An azole alone is sufficient at this timing – the use of SDHIs at T0 should be avoided


  • Good control of eyespot can be achieved at this timing
  • The eyespot risk assessment should be used to assess risk, and a spray applied if risk is high
  • An azole + SDHI mixture will provide good control, as well as providing control of other diseases
  • Foliar diseases are the main target at this timing, so the timing of applications should be targeted to maximise the control of foliar diseases, rather than eyespot

Winter barley

T1 – GS 3031

  • Main timing to control eyespot, if risk is high
  • Azoles and SDHIs will be effective

Spring barley

T1 – GS 25-31

  • Main timing to control eyespot, if risk is high
  • Azoles and SDHIs will be effective


  • Use the AHDB eyespot risk assessment to determine eyespot risk on an individual field basis, and decide on management strategy
  • To reduce risk, avoid wheat or other cereals as a previous crop, use minimum tillage, delay drilling, and use a resistant variety (wheat only)
  • In fields identified as high risk pre-sowing, consider growing a different crop
  • In crops identified as high risk after the spring assessment, treatment with an azole or azole + SDHI mixture at T1 (for wheat and barley) is appropriate
Cereal disease management homepage