- Home
- Knowledge library
- Developing and validating on-farm sampling protocols: sampling in store and during out-loading
Developing and validating on-farm sampling protocols: sampling in store and during out-loading
Summary
Downloads
325_complete_final_reportAbout this project
Abstract
The aim of this project was to establish whether sampling of grain whilst in store provides a reliable method of determining the quality of a grain batch. The results of in-store sampling were compared with those obtained from sampling at intake and during out-loading.
Grain was sampled at a total of 9 farms starting from harvest 2002 through into 2003. The farms selected used a variety of drying methods (high and low temperature and ambient air) and storage methods (bin and on-floor). All sampling in the store was done using a 1.7m grain spear. Results for sampling and grain quality at harvest were from previous work investigating sampling at intake (HGCA Project Report 301).
The stored grain was sampled after approximately 1, 4 and 6 and, in one case, 10 months. In-store sampling was compared with sampling at out-loading by taking samples from the bulk to be loaded using a spear and then taking a litre of grain from each 2 tonne bucket as it was loaded into the lorry. The results of the quality analyses were then compared for the two sets of samples. The grain sampled at out-loading was also sampled at intake to the mill and the analyses done by the project were compared with the results obtained by the mill.
The quality parameters measured (protein, specific weight, moisture and hardness) did not vary markedly during the period of storage and sampling in store. Broadly similar values were obtained for the quality parameters compared with the samples taken at intake and at out-loading. However, because fewer samples are generally taken in store, it is unlikely that the whole range of variability was covered.
Results for mill samples were not statistically different from the results obtained on-farm but were sufficiently different to be commercially important. However, differences did not consistently favour or penalise either mill or supplier.
Despite its limitations, in-store sampling would appear to give a reasonable sample to determine the quality characteristics and obviously is essential
Related research projects
- Defining the basis for variation in water absorption of UK wheat flours
- Investigation of high levels of erucic acid in consignments of double-zero oilseed rape varieties
- Supporting UK malting barley with improved market intelligence on grain skinning
- Validation of fusarium infection risk calculator with AHDB mycotoxin risk assessment and actual DON results
- Genetic improvement of wheat to reduce the potential for acrylamides
- Analysis of the genetic and environmental factors influencing grain quality of oats (PhD)
- Monitoring of mycotoxins and other contaminants in UK cereals used in malting, milling and animal feed (2012–16)
- Identification of fusarium resistance traits in UK oat varieties (PhD)
- Home-grown oilseed rape meal/products as protein sources for pigs/poultry