Friday, 1 March 2019
Results Day 2019 - Overview
- Nitrogen applications can be cut without decreasing yield
- Variable rate seed planting benefits seed and salad crops
- Reducing cultivation depths and removing bedtilling saves money and increases yield
Reducing nitrogen without reducing yields
Once more SPot Scotland has shown you can vastly reduce nitrogen use without seeing any negative impact on yield or crop quality. In fact, we have seen better yields when less nitrogen has been applied.
Marc Allison of NIAB CUF explains: “We’ve almost halved nitrogen use at SPot Scotland and seen yield maintained or increased. Also, there is no impact on crop quality, we have seen no increase in black dot and no more bruising.
“You don’t need an ‘insurance application’ of nitrogen, just use what is recommended, otherwise you could be adding cost and losing yield.”
|Crop harvested||No. Boxes/Ha||69||68||70||58|
|PACKOUT FIGURES||*Packout % (useable)||41%||44%||41%||36%|
Drop the insurance dose: Dr Marc Alison discusses nitrogen results
Variable rate seed spacing success
While the results of the 2019 SPot demo plots did not show that variable rate planting improves yield or pack out, Bruce Farms have found it to be very useful.
Farm Manager Kerr Howatson used soil scanning on some of his more difficult fields, and then varied the rate of salad potato planting depending on the soil type.
More tubers were planted more tightly together in areas with heavier soil, and the result was a crop that was much closer to spec (under 42mm) than would have been the case otherwise.
Kerr says: “We’ve seen huge value in variable rate planting where you need to aim for a smaller size, for example with seed and salads. It really can make a big difference.”
|Crop Harvested||N. Boxes/Ha||55||62||54||53|
|PACKOUT FIGURES||Packout % (useable)||51%||43%||42%||42%|
Vary rate planting for seed and salads? Claire Hodge and Kerr Howatson discuss how precision meets farmer know-how
Cultivation trials prove less is more
After three years of trials it’s clear that a less is more approach is the way to go with cultivations.
Mark Stahlam of NIAB CUF explains: “Year on year the standard farm treatment has yielded more poorly than those treatments where bedtilling has been removed or cultivation depths have been reduced. Not only that, but the reducing cultivations saves time and money.
“I think the staff at SPot Scotland have seen that and are now only bedtilling parts of fields where it is really needed.”
In 2018 three cultivation trials were run using the following variables:
- Bedform 12”, Bedtill 12”, Destone 12”
- Bedform 12”, No Bedtilling, Destone 10”
- Triple bedtiller 12”
|Crop harvested||No. Boxes/Ha||53||57||58|
|PACKOUT FIGURES||*Packout % (useable)||35%||36%||36%|
Lower inputs, higher yields: Dr Mark Stalham on three years of cultivations work